Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | RE: FALSE POSITIVE |
|---|---|
| Date: | Mon, 4 Jun 2007 10:49:03 -0700 |
Nicolas,
From http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS07-028.mspx,
-> [Vulnerability Details] -> [CAPICOM.Certificates Vulnerability - CVE-2007-0940] -> [FAQ for CAPICOM.Certificates Vulnerability - CVE-2007-0940]: EXCERPT (BEGIN) Why is the old version of CAPICOM.dll still on the system after installing this security update? Users may have installed CAPICOM.dll from a source other than Microsoft. CAPICOM.dll may have been installed by a non-Microsoft product. Since the security update cannot determine where the previous CAPICOM.dll version originated, it is left on the system for application compatibility. The previous version does not leave your system vulnerable to this vulnerability. EXCERPT (END) I don't know if this FAQ item applies or not; the Company attribute is "Microsoft Corporation." I doubt it's a custom CAPICOM (e.g., from Citrix) because even my desktop computer has CAPICOM 2.0.0.3, and the patch has been applied to it as well. But the MS bulletin definitely says, "If you have version 2.1.01 or lower, you should update your system," so Nessus is correct in marking it as a vulnerability. Something must be broken in the Microsoft patch. John -----Original Message----- From: John Scherff Sent: Monday, June 04, 2007 10:37 AM To: 'Nicolas Pouvesle'; nessus Cc: Rob Slayden Subject: RE: FALSE POSITIVE Nicolas, The file is at 2.0.0.3 - a vulnerable version. Very strange. I double-checked with MBSA 2.0.1 and it doesn't find any problems, either. Let me dig a little deeper. John -----Original Message----- From: nessus-bounces@list.nessus.org [mailto:nessus-bounces@list.nessus.org] On Behalf Of Nicolas Pouvesle Sent: Monday, June 04, 2007 8:52 AM To: nessus Subject: Re: FALSE POSITIVE On Jun 4, 2007, at 5:10 PM, John Scherff wrote:
Plugin 25167 appears to be producing false-positives. This plugin is in the "Windows : Microsoft Bulletins" family and tests for MS07-028 (flaw in CAPICOM). The scan was run against a freshly-installed, fully-patched Windows 2003 R2 server with Citrix Presentation Server 4.5 installed.
Could you check the default value in the following registry key ? value = SOFTWARE\Classes\CAPICOM.Certificates\CLSID Then get the path in : "SOFTWARE\Classes\CLSID\"+value+"\InprocServer32" and finally check the version of the file pointed by the previous registry key. If this version is smaller than 2.1.0.2 then your server is vulnerable (it is possible to access this activex). Nicolas _______________________________________________ Nessus mailing list Nessus@list.nessus.org http://mail.nessus.org/mailman/listinfo/nessus _______________________________________________ Nessus mailing list Nessus@list.nessus.org http://mail.nessus.org/mailman/listinfo/nessus
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: FALSE POSITIVE, John Scherff |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: FALSE POSITIVE, Nicolas Pouvesle |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: FALSE POSITIVE, John Scherff |
| Next by Thread: | Re: FALSE POSITIVE, Nicolas Pouvesle |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |