Ethical Hacking

Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package.
Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute

Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors.




Network Security Nessus-Users
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: FALSE POSITIVE

Subject: RE: FALSE POSITIVE
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 10:49:03 -0700
Nicolas,

From http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS07-028.mspx,
-> [Vulnerability Details] -> [CAPICOM.Certificates Vulnerability -
CVE-2007-0940] -> [FAQ for CAPICOM.Certificates Vulnerability -
CVE-2007-0940]:

EXCERPT (BEGIN)
Why is the old version of CAPICOM.dll still on the system after
installing this security update? 
Users may have installed CAPICOM.dll from a source other than Microsoft.
CAPICOM.dll may have been installed by a non-Microsoft product. Since
the security update cannot determine where the previous CAPICOM.dll
version originated, it is left on the system for application
compatibility. The previous version does not leave your system
vulnerable to this vulnerability.
EXCERPT (END) 

I don't know if this FAQ item applies or not; the Company attribute is
"Microsoft Corporation."  I doubt it's a custom CAPICOM (e.g., from
Citrix) because even my desktop computer has CAPICOM 2.0.0.3, and the
patch has been applied to it as well.

But the MS bulletin definitely says, "If you have version 2.1.01 or
lower, you should update your system," so Nessus is correct in marking
it as a vulnerability.  Something must be broken in the Microsoft patch.

John

-----Original Message-----
From: John Scherff 
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2007 10:37 AM
To: 'Nicolas Pouvesle'; nessus
Cc: Rob Slayden
Subject: RE: FALSE POSITIVE

Nicolas,

The file is at 2.0.0.3 - a vulnerable version.  Very strange. I
double-checked with MBSA 2.0.1 and it doesn't find any problems, either.
Let me dig a little deeper.  

John

-----Original Message-----
From: nessus-bounces@list.nessus.org
[mailto:nessus-bounces@list.nessus.org] On Behalf Of Nicolas Pouvesle
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2007 8:52 AM
To: nessus
Subject: Re: FALSE POSITIVE


On Jun 4, 2007, at 5:10 PM, John Scherff wrote:

Plugin 25167 appears to be producing false-positives.  This plugin is 
in the "Windows : Microsoft Bulletins" family and tests for
MS07-028 (flaw in CAPICOM).

The scan was run against a freshly-installed, fully-patched Windows
2003 R2 server with Citrix Presentation Server 4.5 installed.


Could you check the default value in the following registry key ?

value = SOFTWARE\Classes\CAPICOM.Certificates\CLSID

Then get the path in :

"SOFTWARE\Classes\CLSID\"+value+"\InprocServer32"

and finally check the version of the file pointed by the previous
registry key. If this version is smaller than 2.1.0.2 then your server
is vulnerable (it is possible to access this activex).


Nicolas
_______________________________________________
Nessus mailing list
Nessus@list.nessus.org
http://mail.nessus.org/mailman/listinfo/nessus
_______________________________________________
Nessus mailing list
Nessus@list.nessus.org
http://mail.nessus.org/mailman/listinfo/nessus

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>