Ethical Hacking

Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package.
Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute

Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors.




Network Security Nessus-Users
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Scanning a x64 bit system

Subject: Re: Scanning a x64 bit system
Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 15:16:03 +0200

On May 23, 2007, at 2:29 PM, jfvanmeter@comcast.net wrote:

I also have a .audit file that checks the file perms

<file_acl: "2">

<user: "Administrators">
        acl_inheritance: "not inherited"
        acl_apply: "This folder, subfolders and files"
        acl_allow: "full control"
        </user>

<user: "SYSTEM">
        acl_inheritance: "not inherited"
        acl_apply: "This folder, subfolders and files"
        acl_allow: "full control"
        </user>

</acl>

<custom_item>
      type: FILE_PERMISSIONS
      description: "%SystemRoot%\system32\telnet.exe"
      value_type: FILE_ACL
      value_data: "1"
      file: "%SystemRoot%\system32\telnet.exe"
</item>


In the custom_item the ACL used is "1" while the one defined before is "2". Could it be the problem ?
Else could you send me the full output of the compliance report and a pcap ?



Thanks,

Nicolas
_______________________________________________
Nessus mailing list
Nessus@list.nessus.org
http://mail.nessus.org/mailman/listinfo/nessus

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>