Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: Nessus 3.2 beta (3.1.3) question |
|---|---|
| Date: | Tue, 17 Apr 2007 07:37:29 -0700 |
I've been using the tcp scanner. I've been using the nmap scanner only when I need a special tweak.
On Apr 17, 2007, at 9:39 AM, Doug Nordwall wrote:
> I've seen the same behavior. Previously, I had always attributed it > to a difference between the port scan and the plugin checks.
The port scans should take that into account as well (except if you use nmap). Could you let me know which port scanner you are using ?
Thanks,
-- Renaud
-- Doug Nordwall Unix, Network, and Security Administrator You mean the vision is subject to low subscription rates?!!? - Scott Stone, on MMORPGs
_______________________________________________ Nessus mailing list Nessus@list.nessus.org http://mail.nessus.org/mailman/listinfo/nessus
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Nessus 3.2 beta (3.1.3) question, Renaud Deraison |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: Re: newbe question, Sean Murray |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Nessus 3.2 beta (3.1.3) question, Renaud Deraison |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |