not that it's much of a help, but that appears to be the code for
SSH_MSG_CHANNEL_EXTENDED_DATA
according to the SSH spec
You mentioned that they are Solaris machines, uniformly. Are they all the
same version of ssh? all the same version of solaris?
On 12/18/06, sven.lag@gmx.de <sven.lag@gmx.de> wrote:
Hello,
I have a problem when scanning Sun Solaris.
Some of them will generate the following problem:
==========================================================================
It was possible to log into the remote host using the supplied password
However the execution of the command "uname -a" failed, so local security
checks have not been enabled
Nessus returns the following error message :
Nessus failed to open a new SSH channel. Receive code was not
SSH_MSG_CHANNEL_OPEN_CONFIRMATION (91). It was : 95
==========================================================================
I do not understand the problem because I can log into this systems with
putty or other SSH-clients without any errors.
More than one SSH-session works.
I have seen that someone else had the same question on July-2006,
but he gets no answer.
Sven
--
"Ein Herz für Kinder" - Ihre Spende hilft! Aktion:
www.deutschlandsegelt.de
Unser Dankeschön: Ihr Name auf dem Segel der 1. deutschen America's
Cup-Yacht!
_______________________________________________
Nessus mailing list
Nessus@list.nessus.org
http://mail.nessus.org/mailman/listinfo/nessus
--
Doug Nordwall
Unix, Network, and Security Administrator
Noise proves nothing. Often a hen who has merely laid an egg cackles as if
she laid an asteroid. -- Mark Twain
_______________________________________________
Nessus mailing list
Nessus@list.nessus.org
http://mail.nessus.org/mailman/listinfo/nessus
