Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: nessusd.rules |
|---|---|
| Date: | Tue, 24 Oct 2006 21:58:21 -0400 |
On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 02:38:33PM -0500, Jeff T wrote:
I'm trying to be creative and deny close to 60 host from being scanned during our audits.
...
I'm trying to figure out why my scan is hanging with error "E2002 - These hosts could not be tested because you are not allowed to do so." after adding deny addresses to the nessusd.rules file.
I could be wrong, but I think NessusWX is still performing the scans against the hosts that it can. [Check the nessusd.messages log to be sure.] You'll need to acknowledge the message box and then click "Stop entire test", but then you should get to the results viewer and have results for those hosts that you were able to test. By the way, an alternative approach is to write a custom plugin that marks selected hosts as "dead" (see what dont_scan_prints.nasl does). For extra credit, you could even add a preference that accepts a list of hosts to be marked as dead at run-time. George -- theall@tenablesecurity.com _______________________________________________ Nessus mailing list Nessus@list.nessus.org http://mail.nessus.org/mailman/listinfo/nessus
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Issues with new install of Nessus, Jeremy Stinson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Issues with new install of Nessus, George A. Theall |
| Previous by Thread: | nessusd.rules, Jeff T |
| Next by Thread: | Re: nessusd.rules, Renaud Deraison |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |