Ethical Hacking

Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package.
Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute

Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors.




Network Security Nessus-Users
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: How to use Nessus 3.0.3 (Linux) with Nmap port scanning

Subject: Re: How to use Nessus 3.0.3 (Linux) with Nmap port scanning
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 13:21:49 +0100 (BST)
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006, Michel Arboi wrote:

On Wed Sep 20 2006 at 01:25, A User wrote:

Is there a way to enable "find_service" to use UDP results?

No, but external_svc_ident.nasl can do that. 

Ok - thanks.

There are devices that people may not be allowed local accounts as
this can be intrusive 

A find_service_udp would be much more intrusive.

But again - what about those devices where we can't get local accounts?

Based on those comments

Which are untrue, because you forgot that UDP standard ports are
tested.

Nessus is not giving a true picture

What is a "true" picture?

An idea of what services are being provided by a device and if possible, 
understand the vulnerabilities associated with it. There are devices that 
run on non-standard UDP ports and it's a little narrow minded to ignore 
these in a complete review.

and  personally I find it frustrating not being able to use one piece of 
software to perform a complete and thorough review.

Can you afford to run nmap -sU -sV for days to get this true picture?
netstat -p would give it instantly.

For a complete review that needs to be performed where I technically 
cannot or am prohibited by the system admin to do this, then yes! It's 
simply not acceptable to not do this where a complete remote only review 
is required.

It should be possible for those users who properly understand the 
limitations of certain OSes / TCP/IP stacks to be able to get a full 
picture.

If such a find_service_udp were written, it would be disabled if 
(safe_checks || ! thorough_checks) 
As most people are running in safe checks and do not set "thorough
tests", this would be useless for 99% of users.

Right, but at least the gives those technically minded users a *choice* 
which is what this is really about. People would like the *option* to do 
this in scenarios where they have have no choice but to do this.

Otherwise you end up making an unreasonable compromise between speed
and accuracy. 

You have to.

For those who which to fire a quick vulnerability scan off yes, I agree. 
But as per my previous comment, give us the option with the appropriate 
warnings.

Cheers,

A.
----

_______________________________________________
Nessus mailing list
Nessus@list.nessus.org
http://mail.nessus.org/mailman/listinfo/nessus

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>