Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: Port scanner |
|---|---|
| Date: | Wed, 13 Sep 2006 23:38:39 +0200 |
On Wed Sep 13 2006 at 17:44, Patrice.Arnal@alcatel.fr wrote:
Until now, I was happy and confident in the use of Nessus's TCP scanner. Today, I had to scan a new machine, behind a FW / router
Does this firewall implement some kind of "defense"? Especially against floods?
I already scanned machines in this configuration
So did I, until I crashed a firewall, and a load balancer a while later. I do not recommend scans through any kind of stateful device.
Nessus TCP scanner reported 0 open ports
That's very odd. Did it run? Did you try to sniff the traffic between the machines? If you are running Nessus 2.2.x, you could also edit nessus_tcp_scanner.c, change the DEBUG constant, recompile & reinstall the plugin & retry. I should be able to interpret the results from nessusd.dump
My question is : What can I do in order to be sure that the nessus TCP scanner gives me the right results? Is there parameters I can play with?
nessus_tcp_scanner changes its behaviour automatically when the remote
target starts dropping packets. The initial & maximum number of
parallel TCP connections are modified by several parameters.
The most important parameters are max_checks ("number of checks to
perform at the same time") and safe_checks.
If you set max_checks to 1 and safe_checks to TRUE, nessus_tcp_scanner
will be much less "aggressive". This might solve your problem, *if*
the firewall is trying to protect the target against a "SYN flood".
--
http://arboi.da.ru/ http://ma75.blogspot.com/
PGP key ID : 0x0BBABA91 - 0x1320924F0BBABA91
Fingerprint: 1048 B09B EEAF 20AA F645 2E1A 1320 924F 0BBA BA91
_______________________________________________
Nessus mailing list
Nessus@list.nessus.org
http://mail.nessus.org/mailman/listinfo/nessus
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Proceso de login muy lento, Doug Nordwall |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: DOS attacks again Cisco Router, Michel Arboi |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Port scanner, Renaud Deraison |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Port scanner, 徐永毅 |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |