Ethical Hacking

Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package.
Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute

Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors.




Network Security Nessus-Users
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Inconsistent scan results using 3.0.2

Subject: RE: Inconsistent scan results using 3.0.2
Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 08:09:04 -0400
 
Two scans of the same host, first one came up clean... interesting as 
it is a web server,
 
ran it again and now showed all the ports that should have been shown 
in the first one.
 
Now the first time I entered two addresses: addr1, addr2
 
The first machine reported all the holes, while the second one in 
question did not.
 
The second scan of the system in question was scanned just by itself 
and reported correctly.

George wrote:

Are addr1 and addr2 on the same physical machine by any chance? If not,
this sort of behaviour is suggestive of resource         >contention issues.
Are you aware of any when you were running the first set of scans? Is the
behaviour repeatable? And          >lastly, what does the nessusd.messages
log tell you about the first scan of addr2?

No they are two different machines. Resources do not seem to be an issue.
Systems were not that busy and the local scanner normally scans up to five
or more systems at one time. I have not tried to repeat it yet, but will do
early next week. I will save the log file just in case. Looking at the log
file I cannot find anything out of the normal except for the timing which
suggests that it did not scan properly. If you want it I will forward it. I
have not ruled out "some weird" network issue. We will continue to examine
on this end.

Thank you for the response.

John.


_______________________________________________
Nessus mailing list
Nessus@list.nessus.org
http://mail.nessus.org/mailman/listinfo/nessus

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>