Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: Nessus Scoring System |
|---|---|
| Date: | Thu, 06 Apr 2006 16:53:19 -0400 |
At 02:02 PM 4/6/2006, mudyo26 CryptoMail User wrote:
Is there any Scoring system / Risk Score based on Nessus output ?
What if an organization does scanning every day and want to know how the
"security score" is increasing or decreasing based on vulnerabilities found(not found).
I read one posting by Renaud in early 2005 in Nessus lists that it is being worked upon.
Tenable has used CVSS to score vulnerabilities in Nessus for some time now. We've not gone back and scored all 10k+ plugins, but the major ones have been done. Incidentally, our passive scanning product uses CVSS scores as well.
Tenable's console product, Security Center, also does two types of scoring.
First, based on the types of data collected by Nessus or through passive monitoring, it discovers your assets. If you know what an asset list already you can upload those as well. Assets can be things like "DMZ Windows 2000 Web Servers" , "Core Cisco Routers" or stuff like the "Financial Database". You can then use those assets to report on the discovered vulnerabilities and compare them to each other with tending. The advantage of doing it by asset, is you get a comparative trend, for each user's view of which asset groups they are authorized to see. In other words, small changes in vulns for your Cisco routers don't mean much in the grand scheme of things, but might mean a lot to the folks running your routers.
Second, the Security Center assigns point values to the low|medium|high severity levels. Through the user interface, you can do just about any type of query (with filters for Nessus IDs, families, ports, .etc) and ask it to summarize all IPs or ClassA|B|C, along with a score. This way you can do a report and see which IP is the 'most vulnerable' based on a score.
If you're dealing with a pure Nessus solution, I would not discount the severity level of the underlying plugin scores. Tenable puts a great deal of thought into assigning these severity levels, but they are a level higher than something like a CVSS score.
Ron Gula, CTO Tenable Network Security
_______________________________________________ Nessus mailing list Nessus@list.nessus.org http://mail.nessus.org/mailman/listinfo/nessus
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: NeWT Question: NeWT hangs at 98/99%, Deeds, Chad |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | running single specific plugin from command line, Max Yellow |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Nessus Scoring System, mike . sleeper |
| Next by Thread: | running single specific plugin from command line, Max Yellow |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |