Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | nessus: different results at different scan? |
|---|---|
| Date: | Sat, 25 Mar 2006 19:08:10 -0500 |
Lately, I ran NESSUS 2.6 against a list of seven (7) Check Point VPN-1 on Windows hosts with different results: The 1st run, the report showed 6 hosts instead of all 7, missing one host. ( I had triple checked the IP addresses were accurate.) The 2nd run, right after the first run, against the same list of hosts, the report showed three (3) hosts *including* the one missing in the 1st run, five their disappeared, or not responded. The 3rd run, on the second day, the report showed 2 hosts. Appreciate any thought on these scenarios are appreciated. Thanks, DF
_______________________________________________ Nessus mailing list Nessus@list.nessus.org http://mail.nessus.org/mailman/listinfo/nessus
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: more Syntax error with the send(), Renaud Deraison |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Nessus frontend and scheduling, Jason Ledford |
| Previous by Thread: | more Syntax error with the send(), Tom Pimienta |
| Next by Thread: | Nessus frontend and scheduling, Jason Ledford |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |