Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: Webfind.exe |
|---|---|
| Date: | Mon, 27 Feb 2006 07:06:46 -0500 |
On Sun, Feb 26, 2006 at 09:16:16PM -0500, Ian Scott wrote:
In the results, there is a message that Nessus "discovered" the webfind.exe cgi script.
Which plugin reported this? At first blush, it would seem as if you're talking about #10475 (webfind.nasl), but does not contain the word "discovered".
What would cause this false positive?
Why do you say it's a false-positive? Have you looked at the web logs from the affected server? Or looked at a packet capture from running the plugin in question? George -- theall@tenablesecurity.com _______________________________________________ Nessus mailing list Nessus@list.nessus.org http://mail.nessus.org/mailman/listinfo/nessus
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Webfind.exe, Ian Scott |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: a scan hangs my ADSL router, Gil Freund |
| Previous by Thread: | Webfind.exe, Ian Scott |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Webfind.exe, Ian Scott |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |