Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: Varying results from scans |
|---|---|
| Date: | Tue, 21 Feb 2006 17:27:53 -0800 (PST) |
--- Josh Zlatin-Amishav <josh@tkos.co.il> wrote:
On Mon, 20 Feb 2006, Ameet Zaveri wrote:I am using Nessus 3.0.1 on Red Hat Linux to scan multiplehostson a network. The scan is initiated by a shell scriptrunningNessusClient 1.0.0.RC4 (not via GUI). I am getting different results during different runs on the same hosts. Inparticularthere are 2 NT 4.0 based web servers which have OpenSSLsecurityholes. If I run a scan with only a single target host, itseemsto always find (and report) the vulnerability. When I runthescan with a target list specified in a file - about 10targets -it sometimes misses the same vulnerability. I ran a testwith acouple of hosts deleted from the target list and it foundthehole in one of the 2 hosts that are known to have this hole. How do I go about debugging this situation? In looking atthemessage log on the server side I noticed the following. Itsaid"Not launching openssl_denial.nasl against xx.xx.xx.197 noneofthe required tcp ports are open (this is not an error)" forthehost where it did not find the hole. But it said "launching openssl_denial.nasl against xx.xx.xx.198 [1060]" for thesimilarhost where it found the hole.Which port scanner[s] are you using? -- - Josh
I am using the built-in scanner and ping, I think. Here are the settings from the config file: begin(SCANNER_SET) 10180 = yes 10335 = yes [rest are no] end __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ Nessus mailing list Nessus@list.nessus.org http://mail.nessus.org/mailman/listinfo/nessus
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | sigpipe caughet, Juan B |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Varying results from scans, Ameet Zaveri |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Varying results from scans, Josh Zlatin-Amishav |
| Next by Thread: | sigpipe caughet, Juan B |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |