Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Varying results from scans |
|---|---|
| Date: | Mon, 20 Feb 2006 20:00:08 -0800 (PST) |
I am using Nessus 3.0.1 on Red Hat Linux to scan multiple hosts on a network. The scan is initiated by a shell script running NessusClient 1.0.0.RC4 (not via GUI). I am getting different results during different runs on the same hosts. In particular there are 2 NT 4.0 based web servers which have OpenSSL security holes. If I run a scan with only a single target host, it seems to always find (and report) the vulnerability. When I run the scan with a target list specified in a file - about 10 targets - it sometimes misses the same vulnerability. I ran a test with a couple of hosts deleted from the target list and it found the hole in one of the 2 hosts that are known to have this hole. How do I go about debugging this situation? In looking at the message log on the server side I noticed the following. It said "Not launching openssl_denial.nasl against xx.xx.xx.197 none of the required tcp ports are open (this is not an error)" for the host where it did not find the hole. But it said "launching openssl_denial.nasl against xx.xx.xx.198 [1060]" for the similar host where it found the hole. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ Nessus mailing list Nessus@list.nessus.org http://mail.nessus.org/mailman/listinfo/nessus
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | User not allowed to scan!, daveads |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Varying results from scans, Josh Zlatin-Amishav |
| Previous by Thread: | User not allowed to scan!, daveads |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Varying results from scans, Josh Zlatin-Amishav |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |