Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: NeWT Question |
|---|---|
| Date: | Wed, 25 Jan 2006 11:09:11 -0500 |
On Jan 25, 2006, at 10:49 AM, jfvanmeter@comcast.net wrote:
Thanks Nicolas I wish I could, what I have is the report from a third party that ran NeWT and scanned several servers (all built from the same image). Generated the report and sent it to management. Now I have to figure out what is false and what is real.
I've been reading that having both optimize_test and safe_checks enable can generate fail hits and I know they had both enable.
The flash issue only shows up on one server, just like i have a hit for the Guest account has to many privileges only a single hit on a one server.
If the plugin has reported an error, I can only suppose 3 things :
Nicolas _______________________________________________ Nessus mailing list Nessus@list.nessus.org http://mail.nessus.org/mailman/listinfo/nessus
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | "high" vulnerability with TomCat, Puren, Steve |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: "high" vulnerability with TomCat, George A. Theall |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: NeWT Question, jfvanmeter |
| Next by Thread: | Re: NeWT Question, jfvanmeter |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |