Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: Alternatives to Nessus, License question |
|---|---|
| Date: | Wed, 24 Aug 2005 20:50:23 +0200 |
On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 10:35:46AM -0400, Ron Gula wrote:
This is the core issue. Tenable does not grant the right for people to bundle the plugin feed with their products. I can buy symantec anti-virus for $39/year, but that does not give me the right to bundle it and resell it in my own security package. Just because we sell direct feeds and have registered feeds available to the public, doesn't give them the right to re-sell it as their own product or their own content. This may seem like a fine line here, but to Tenable there is a big problem when someone puts Nessus and the Tenable plugins on an appliance and calls it the 'Scanner Pro 9000'. (I made that up BTW) Or even more interesting are larger companies who are including Nessus in their router, switch, authentication, ids, sim, .etc system.
would it be an option if the license for the registered feed
requires any user interface and resulting report to have a clearly
visible hint that the Tool/Report uses the Registered Plugins
of Tenable Network Security?
Maybe make the Tenable, the Nessus or another Logo a requirement.
Perhaps for continuity the previous conditions could be kept for the 2.2
series.
This would even improve your needs, since with the current license
it would theoretically be possible to have a automatic
download&compile®ister process for a appliance.
At the same time, with an accordingly updated GTK client (logo or
whatever), it would be OK to use the standard Nessus package for
Debian, Fedora, SUSE, etc. etc. out-of-the-box.
Best
Jan
--
Jan-Oliver Wagner http://intevation.de/~jan/
Intevation GmbH http://intevation.de/
Kolab Konsortium http://kolab-konsortium.de/
FreeGIS http://freegis.org/
_______________________________________________
Nessus mailing list
Nessus@list.nessus.org
http://mail.nessus.org/mailman/listinfo/nessus
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Inconsistent port scans, Michel Arboi |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: plugin 19402, Mark Natoli |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: Alternatives to Nessus, License question, Ron Gula |
| Next by Thread: | RE: Alternatives to Nessus, License question, DePriest, Jason R |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |