Ethical Hacking

Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package.
Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute

Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors.




Network Security Nessus-Users
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Alternatives to Nessus, License question

Subject: Re: Alternatives to Nessus, License question
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 20:50:23 +0200
On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 10:35:46AM -0400, Ron Gula wrote:
This is the core issue. Tenable does not grant the right for people to
bundle the plugin feed with their products. I can buy symantec anti-virus
for $39/year, but that does not give me the right to bundle it and resell
it in my own security package. Just because we sell direct feeds and have
registered feeds available to the public, doesn't give them the right to
re-sell it as their own product or their own content.

This may seem like a fine line here, but to Tenable there is a big
problem when someone puts Nessus and the Tenable plugins on an appliance
and calls it the 'Scanner Pro 9000'. (I made that up BTW) Or even more
interesting are larger companies who are including Nessus in their
router, switch, authentication, ids, sim, .etc system.

would it be an option if the license for the registered feed
requires any user interface and resulting report to have a clearly
visible hint that the Tool/Report uses the Registered Plugins
of Tenable Network Security?
Maybe make the Tenable, the Nessus or another Logo a requirement.
Perhaps for continuity the previous conditions could be kept for the 2.2
series.

This would even improve your needs, since with the current license
it would theoretically be possible to have a automatic
download&compile&register process for a appliance.

At the same time, with an accordingly updated GTK client (logo or
whatever), it would be OK to use the standard Nessus package for
Debian, Fedora, SUSE, etc. etc. out-of-the-box.

Best

        Jan

-- 
Jan-Oliver Wagner               http://intevation.de/~jan/
Intevation GmbH                      http://intevation.de/
Kolab Konsortium               http://kolab-konsortium.de/
FreeGIS                                http://freegis.org/
_______________________________________________
Nessus mailing list
Nessus@list.nessus.org
http://mail.nessus.org/mailman/listinfo/nessus

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>