Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | False positive result for Outlook Express patches via registry check? |
|---|---|
| Date: | Thu, 18 Aug 2005 13:41:02 -0400 |
I seem to be having a bit of difficulty with my scans reporting a hits for the following plugins: id 13643 - Cumulative Security Update for Outlook Express (823353), smb_nt_ms04-018.nasl and id 12208 - Cumulative Update for Outlook Express (837009), smb_nt_ms04-013.nasl Some quick examination appears to show that: 1) The systems do not have the patches in question applied. 2) The affected component, Outlook Express, is NOT installed on the systems that are identified. (MS Outlook is not installed either b/4 someone asks the question) So, while it is true that the patch has not been applied, it is not true that the vulnerability exists. Am I missing something or not looking at this the right way? If my stab in the dark is correct, then is there some way to put some type of sequential or boolean test logic to require the existence of the product as a condition for returning a vulnerability? ---------------------------------------------------- Mike Sleeper CISSP, CCSE, CCFS ---------------------------------------------------- ************* DISCLAIMER *********************************** The above comments are my own and do not necessarily represent those of my employer or contractor. Any information or advice provided by me shall be given under the "caveat emptor" principal. *****************************************************************
_______________________________________________ Nessus mailing list Nessus@list.nessus.org http://mail.nessus.org/mailman/listinfo/nessus
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | MS Patch Scanning, PaJohnston |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Webmin Module, Jon D. Irish |
| Previous by Thread: | MS Patch Scanning, PaJohnston |
| Next by Thread: | Webmin Module, Jon D. Irish |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |