Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | RE: Scan Issue |
|---|---|
| Date: | Thu, 23 Jun 2005 11:42:21 -0400 |
But I stopped the scan after almost 15 hours: do you think if waited longer, the test could have been completed??! Also, if I deselect Nmap, how do I cover the UDP port scanning Thanks, Bilal -----Original Message----- From: Michel Arboi [mailto:mikhail@nessus.org] Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2005 11:10 AM To: Nasrallah, Bilal [CAR:1229:EXCH] Cc: Nessus@list.nessus.org Subject: Re: Scan Issue On Thu Jun 23 2005 at 16:59, Bilal Nasrallah wrote:
I am running a scan against a network device and have noticed that when I select Nmap (NASL Wrapper) from Scan Options (Port scanner), the scan hangs.
IMHO, it did not hang, it is just awfully slow.
The options that I have selected under Port scanner are: Nmap, Exclude toplevel domain wildcard host, Nessus TCP scanner, and Ping the remote host. When I deselected the Nmap option, the scan worked just fine. Any thought would highly appreciated.
You found the solution by yourself: deselect Nmap.
I suspect that the timing options are badly broken in the last version(s). A
couple of days ago, I scanned a friend machine.
nessus_tcp_scanner was four time quicker:
380 s with nessus_tcp_scanner, 1500+ s with nmap -T 4 ("aggressive"
timing)
Maybe we should add --host_timeout when we launch Nmap?
e.g., if thourough_tests are disabled, we give it only half an hour to
perform the job. Anybody against this?
_______________________________________________ Nessus mailing list Nessus@list.nessus.org http://mail.nessus.org/mailman/listinfo/nessus
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Scan Issue, Michel Arboi |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | problem with remote registry access, Matt Craig |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Scan Issue, Michel Arboi |
| Next by Thread: | RE: Scan Issue, Bilal Nasrallah |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |