Ethical Hacking

Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package.
Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute

Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors.




Network Security Nessus-Users
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Newbie Plugin Question , Part 2

from [John Harris] Network Security [Permanent Link]
Subject: Newbie Plugin Question , Part 2
Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 10:39:34 -0700 (PDT) 
Hi George,

Wanted to thank you for pointing us to the enable dependencies option.

One of the tests I was trying to run, msmqs_overflow.nasl, worked
perfectly after I did this.  It ran four or five prerequiste tests and
then the msmqs overflow test.

Unfortunately for us, the tcp_seq_window.nasl test still returns the odd
key "TCP/seq_window_flaw is missing" message.  I'm testing this against a
Windows XP/XP SP1/XP SP2 combination that I know has the vulnerability
(they are unpatched and the Microsoft Update wizard gives the
vulnerability case KB893066.nasl).

So are there any other reasons this "key" shows up here as not obtainable?
I see all the prerequist tests run successfully, and this test does fire
off obviously.  There are no firewalls impeding the scan (we have a
firewall in place with traffic wide open to our scanning servers)?

Sincerely,

John
_______________________________________________
Nessus mailing list
Nessus@list.nessus.org
http://mail.nessus.org/mailman/listinfo/nessus
[More with this subject...]




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: XML output - should <data> be, Drew Simonis
Next by Date:  RE: Scanning 65K ports on 45 subnets, Fender, Brian
Previous by Thread:  NetBIOS checks on NT - problem?, Brent Deterding
Next by Thread:  Re: Newbie Plugin Question , Part 2, George A. Theall
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]