Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | RE: Tenable license discussion - Nessus engine |
|---|---|
| Date: | Wed, 26 Jan 2005 12:22:52 -0800 |
I'm sorry, I have been staring at your question, and cannot decipher it. I did start a new thread instead of expanding on an 80K... I do not believe I am using debating techniques here. I need to reply to Renaud, Ron and Tenable and have not done so - just lazy I guess. I asked very specific questions about the Tenable/Nessus relationship and their business plans. They have been amazingly honest and forth-coming. I know most corporations would be this open. On the otherhand, I believe there were several questions unanswered before the 80K dialog. So, the direction for Nessus seems to be: 1. The majority of the plugins will be proprietary to Tenable. There is no real room to have any real involvement by an open-source community when the submissions will compete (and push-come-to-shove loose to the Tenable submissions), so the future of Nessus plugins will be to support Tenable activities 2. The core Nessus system will become proprietary Tenable (as alluded to by Renaud's remarks to this message). Far as I can tell by the responses by most on this list, this seems to be fine with most Nessus users. As I have stated - Nessus is a critical resource for the entire world, if you include cyber-terrorism looming, and such. Once Nessus is closed and Tenable, and if Tenable were to collaps, be sold to another company, or whatever - Nessus will be gone. So, my interest is more than *idle*. Robert -----Original Message----- From: nessus-bounces@list.nessus.org [mailto:nessus-bounces@list.nessus.org]On Behalf Of Matt Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2005 6:57 AM To: nessus@list.nessus.org Subject: Re: Tenable license discussion - Nessus engine
Tenable Network Security, as you will probably be interested to know other restrictions about the redistribution of Nessus 2.2 (and newer) binaries.Curious about this statement. Is the Nessus engine somehow non-GPL?
I guess it was *idle* curiosity that caused you to quote the entirety of
an 80K message to (not) support your 11 words?
--
Matt {ml [at] mesh3.com}
_______________________________________________
Nessus mailing list
Nessus@list.nessus.org
http://mail.nessus.org/mailman/listinfo/nessus
_______________________________________________
Nessus mailing list
Nessus@list.nessus.org
http://mail.nessus.org/mailman/listinfo/nessus
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: run nessus as root?, Martin Mačok |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Tenable license discussion - Nessus engine, Renaud Deraison |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Tenable license discussion - Nessus engine, Matt |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Tenable license discussion - Nessus engine, Renaud Deraison |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |