Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Pen testing questions |
|---|---|
| Date: | Fri, 19 Nov 2004 14:59:33 -0500 |
I recently pen tested a domain I oversee and came across the following holes that were puzzlers. snmp (161/tcp) High It was possible to crash either the remote host or the firewall in between us and the remote host by sending an UDP packet of null size going to port 161 (snmp) This flaw may allow an attacker to shut down your network. CVE : CVE-2000-0221 BID : 1009 My gear is behind a Cisco router and PIX not Nortel as the Bugtraq ID suggests. I'm also blocking all SNMP traffic at the router and firewall so I'm not sure why this went off. http (80/tcp) High It was possible to make IIS use 100% of the CPU by sending it malformed extension data in the URL requested, preventing him to serve web pages to legitimate clients. Solution : Microsoft has made patches available at : - For Internet Information Server 4.0: http://www.microsoft.com/Downloads/Release.asp?ReleaseID=20906 - For Internet Information Server 5.0: http://www.microsoft.com/Downloads/Release.asp?ReleaseID=20904 Risk factor : High CVE : CVE-2000- Already have SP3 on Win2k which negates this update. general/tcp High It was possible to crash the remote machine by flooding it with ICMP type 9 packets. A cracker may use this attack to make this host crash continuously, preventing you from working properly. Solution : upgrade your Windows 9x operating system or change it. Reference : http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=KB en-us q216141 and http (80/tcp) High The remote web server dies when an URL consisting of a long invalid string of % is sent. A cracker may use this flaw to make your server crash continually. Solution : upgrade your server or firewall it. Risk factor : High Running Windows 2000 server with latest patches on this machine. smtp (25/tcp) High It was possible to perform a denial of service against the remote Interscan SMTP server by sending it a special long HELO command. This problem allows an attacker to prevent your Interscan SMTP server from handling requests. Solution : contact your vendor for a patch. Risk factor : High CVE : CAN-1999-1529 BID : 787 Exchange 2003 on Windows 2000 with latest patches. general/udp High It was possible to make the remote server crash using the 'bonk' attack. An attacker may use this flaw shut down this server, thus preventing your network from working properly. Solution : contact your operating system vendor for a patch. Risk factor : High CVE : CAN-1999-0258 Is this a false positive? Fully patches Win2K server. Confidentiality Disclosure: The information contained in this electronic mail transmission is confidential, and is intended only for the stated entity or individual recipient of the transmission. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, disclosure, copying, distribution, or reliance upon the content of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic mail transmission in error, please reply to the sender, and delete this message from your in-box and Internet server.
_______________________________________________ Nessus mailing list Nessus@list.nessus.org http://mail.nessus.org/mailman/listinfo/nessus
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: [Openvpn-users] Re: Anyone know how to detect OpenVPN traffic?, George P Boutwell |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | bind() failed : Cannot assign requested address ??, Brennon Williams |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: [Openvpn-users] Re: Anyone know how to detect OpenVPN traffic?, Michael Scheidell |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Pen testing questions, Michel Arboi |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |