Ethical Hacking

Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package.
Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute

Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors.




Network Security Nessus-Users
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: "Real-time" Vulnerability Assessment

Subject: Re: "Real-time" Vulnerability Assessment
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 08:20:45 -0400
At 02:40 PM 8/30/2004 +0530, Samir Kelekar wrote:
Just wanted some feedback from experienced VA experts on this list.
What do people think of agent-based real-time VA using nessus?
Is anyone aware of any activity regarding the above?
Do you think real-time VA is viable?

regards,
Samir Kelekar

Hi Samir,

I'm sure there are plenty of different opinions on this topic,
but the three that I share are this:

- If you can run an agent on a system, such as nessusd, then
you have some sort of credentials which allows you to do this.
Given the choice between a network scan and a host level
assessment (Nessus can do both) I would choose the host
level assessment.

- Since you said 'real-time' along with 'agent-based' I'd like
to point out Tenable's passive vulnerability scanner named
NeVO. It sniff's network traffic and gives you a list of hosts,
ports, who's communication to who and a list of vulnerabilities
in a Nessus .nsr style report. Our research folks at Tenable
write the plugins for Nessus and as we do this, we make sure
to write plugins for NeVO.

- When other folks say 'real-time', in almost all cases, this
corresponds to continuous network scanning. Usually folks
who do this are scanning for new/missing open ports,
new/missing systems or new vulnerabilities. Our Lightning
Console can do this, but we really don't recommend for
people to continuously port scan or ping sweep their networks
and feel that NeVO is a more accurate way to find open ports.
Typically, for scans that occur on a daily or weekly basis, we've
seen people minimize network impact by only scanning ports
less than 1024. This would miss Sasser and many other
backdoors and trojans.


Ron Gula, CTO
Tenable Network Security


_______________________________________________
Nessus mailing list
Nessus@list.nessus.org
http://mail.nessus.org/mailman/listinfo/nessus

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>