Well said Michel.
Eric,
You're inconsistent with your postings. On the Nessus list you talk
about a dumb admin who scans a /20 network and on the Nmap list, you
complain about the performance of Nmap when scanning a couple of /20
networks.
BTW, looking at what your company does, aren't you by any chance
scanning your hosted customer's networks ? Without their permission ?
I suggest you get your act together and follow the list charter.
--
M@x
eric wrote:
The point I'm making is that I'd like to see more protections
against the folks who are actually authorized to use it; do I trust
Joe-Admin who scans his network 15 times an hour (his /20, at that)
to not be an idiot? No.
_______________________________________________
Nessus mailing list
Nessus@list.nessus.org
http://mail.nessus.org/mailman/listinfo/nessus
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Strange 3.59ALPHA3
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 15:14:08 -0500
From: eric <eric-list-nmap@catastrophe.net>
Organization: Catastrophe.Net <http://www.catastrophe.net/>
To: Nmap-dev <nmap-dev@insecure.org>
So I've been beating up a few /20's all day here testing the latest
alpha. Unfortunately, I've found that the scans seem to take 2-3
times longer than a normal scan would using 3.55. Even using
parallel scans seems to be slow.
What can I do to show comparisons, send a -dd output?
Thanks.
- Eric
---------------------------------------------------------------------
For help using this (nmap-dev) mailing list, send a blank email to
nmap-dev-help@insecure.org . List archive: http://seclists.org
_______________________________________________
Nessus mailing list
Nessus@list.nessus.org
http://mail.nessus.org/mailman/listinfo/nessus
