Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: Privelege separation |
|---|---|
| Date: | Wed, 25 Aug 2004 00:49:40 +0200 |
On Tue Aug 24 2004 at 23:46, eric wrote:
Yes, OpenSSL is one large conglameration of mish-mash. But hey, that's a whole other story - I'm not looking for you to tell me where the problems-by-proxy are.
You are asking us to put expensive security to protect Nessus against mysterious bugs that might happen one day. I'm pointing where the next bug is likely to appear.
Indeed I am, and I'm working on some stuff to get at least the listener privsep'ed.
Don't work, just think: Use stunnel, chroot it, etc. and configure it to connect back to nessusd. Configure nessusd to use login / password authentication instead of certificates. Do not password protect your client certificates (because of a limitation in the GUI). Et voila, you have your privilege separation on the listener. _______________________________________________ Nessus mailing list Nessus@list.nessus.org http://mail.nessus.org/mailman/listinfo/nessus
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: auto_enable_dependencies doesn't seem to work correctly for 2.0.12, Jason Haar |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Nessus Option?, Michel Arboi |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Privelege separation, eric |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Privelege separation, Renaud Deraison |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |