Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: netstat scanner |
|---|---|
| Date: | Tue, 17 Aug 2004 13:31:19 +0200 |
On Tue Aug 17 2004 at 13:04, Hemsley, Trevor wrote:
But presumably suffers from the disadvantage that if a machine is compromised and netstat is replaced in order to hide trojan ports then that will not be detected...
Nothing is perfect. It depends what you are looking for. If you have to audit a very sensitive production machine, I'd suggest that you use this rather than classical port scanners. You can also combined several scanners. e.g. netstat and nmap with TCP scan only on standard port range and aggressive timing policy. _______________________________________________ Nessus mailing list Nessus@list.nessus.org http://mail.nessus.org/mailman/listinfo/nessus
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | netstat scanner, Michel Arboi |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: netstat scanner, Hemsley, Trevor |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: netstat scanner, Hemsley, Trevor |
| Next by Thread: | Re: netstat scanner, Hugo van der Kooij |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |