Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: [Full-disclosure] Re: RLA ("Remote LanD Attack") |
|---|---|
| Date: | Tue, 20 Dec 2005 11:42:48 -0500 |
Andrew Simmons:
I have had numerous successful attacks take place between
multiple services providers. All of which are big names. (Comcast
and Verizon). Besides my own test, and the test my Friends assisted
with, I have received multiple reports of others trying the exploit
out themselves, and being successful.
Although, I can understand what you are saying, the attacks are
still obviously working. Have you tried executing an attack your
self?
On 12/20/05, Andrew Simmons <asimmons@messagelabs.com> wrote:
Synister Syntax wrote:You are correct if your router is configured with such an ACL, you would be protected. The problem, again, is Consumer grade devices have no such ACLs, and have no way for you to manually add such. Now corporate grade devices have measures where the administrators can write such ACLs that would block spoofed packets, but that doesn't mean the administrators are enforcing them.Surely, not only the end point, but any router between the source and the target that's using uRPF (which is a complete no-brainer -- any ISP or NSP worthy of the name will be using this) will kill the attack. Or to put it another way, AFAICT a successful attack would require for all the intermediate routers to be misconfigured. cheers \a -- Andrew Simmons Technical Security Consultant MessageLabs Mobile: +44 (7917) 178745 asimmons@messagelabs.com www.messagelabs.com MessageLabs - Be certain ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email ______________________________________________________________________
-- Regards, SynSyn Network Manager, Server Administrator, Security Specialist (http://www.teamtrinix.com) _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Full-disclosure] RE: RLA ("Remote LanD Attack"), alessandroa |
|---|---|
| Previous by Thread: | [Full-disclosure] Re: RLA ("Remote LanD Attack"), Synister Syntax |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |