Ethical Hacking

Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package.
Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute

Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors.




Network Security NTBugtraq
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Full-disclosure] Re: RLA ("Remote LanD Attack")

Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Re: RLA ("Remote LanD Attack")
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 11:42:48 -0500
Andrew Simmons:

     I have had numerous successful attacks take place between
multiple services providers.  All of which are big names.  (Comcast
and Verizon).  Besides my own test, and the test my Friends assisted
with, I have received multiple reports of others trying the exploit
out themselves, and being successful.

     Although, I can understand what you are saying, the attacks are
still obviously working.  Have you tried executing an attack your
self?

On 12/20/05, Andrew Simmons <asimmons@messagelabs.com> wrote:
Synister Syntax wrote:

     You are correct if your router is configured with such an ACL,
you would be protected.  The problem, again, is Consumer grade devices
have no such ACLs, and have no way for you to manually add such.  Now
corporate grade devices have measures where the administrators can
write such ACLs that would block spoofed packets, but that doesn't
mean the administrators are enforcing them.



Surely, not only the end point, but any router between the source and
the target that's using uRPF (which is a complete no-brainer -- any ISP
or NSP worthy of the name will be using this) will kill the attack.

Or to put it another way, AFAICT a successful attack would require for
all the intermediate routers to be misconfigured.


cheers

\a

--
Andrew Simmons
Technical Security Consultant
MessageLabs

Mobile: +44 (7917) 178745
asimmons@messagelabs.com
  www.messagelabs.com

MessageLabs - Be certain

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
______________________________________________________________________



--
Regards,
SynSyn
Network Manager, Server Administrator, Security Specialist
(http://www.teamtrinix.com)
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>