Hi Gadi,
With all due respect to your wishes and intent, a research on different
vendors, showing what vendor responds to threats, after how long and how
effectively plus how many security issues appear with each would have made
sense to me.
Having worked closely with the security teams of most large commercial
vendors (IBM, Oracle, Microsoft, Apple, HP, Adobe, Real) I can quite
honestly say that, of all of them, Oracle is the only company to still treat
security in this way. Most other organizations "got it" years ago and while
there could be improvements made in various areas the most improvement could
be made at Oracle.
Showing the Good and thus flushing the Bad without dissing anyone. Pure
facts.
Firstly, it's due to the facts that I posted as I did. It is fact that the
patch for Alert 68 fails to properly fix a large number of holes it was
touted to fix. It is fact that a large number of companies that spent a
great deal of money installing the patch have wasted their time. It is fact
that Oracle database servers are still vulnerable to security holes that
were reported to Oracle years ago.
Attacking one vendor may make sense in some cases.. yes, again, attacking
one vendor in public in *this* *fashion* may be long over-due, but it also
seems to me to be rather.. in poor taste? Especially coming out of the
blue with no past public statements.
Oh, this wasn't out of the blue; and there have been a great number of
public statements about Oracle's failings. Not just from myself, I'll add,
but others as well.
I sympathize with your concerns and I am known to be FAR from a person who
doesn't voice his opinions - and loudly, but it only makes me wonder why
now,
Because enough is enough.
why them
Because they seem to be the only ones that don't get it.
and why here.
I tried my local newspaper but they weren't interested. Bugtraq was my
second choice ;)
Seriously though, where else would you post this? Wasn't this one of the
main reasons for bugtraq being created in the first place?
Now, I am not an Oracle advocate - far from it, but your subject line says
it all, and makes me look-down on your post automatically, which is a
shame:
"Complete failure of Oracle security response and utter neglect of their
responsibility to their customers"
Complete? Failure? Utter neglect?
Yes. Based upon the facts the Oracle security response has been a failure.
How else can you describe it?
If you gave me a patch and said it fixed a security flaw and it turns out it
didn't I'd call that a failure. Multiply that by a factor of tens and you've
got yourself a complete failure. If I did this to my customers I'd sack
myself for neglect. Really, I would.
Cheers,
David
