Microsoft Security Bulletin MS05-027:
Vulnerability in Server Message Block Could Allow Remote Code Execution
(896422)
Bulletin URL:
<http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS05-027.mspx>
Version Number: 1.0
Issued Date: Tuesday, June 14, 2005
Impact of Vulnerability: Remote Code Execution Maximum Severity Rating:
Critical
Patch(es) Replaced: This bulletin replaces several prior security
updates. See the frequently asked questions (FAQ) section of this
bulletin for the complete list.
Caveats: None
Tested Software:
Affected Software:
------------------
* Microsoft Windows 2000 Service Pack 3 and Microsoft Windows 2000
Service Pack 4 <http://tinyurl.com/d7prs>
* Microsoft Windows XP Service Pack 1 and Microsoft Windows XP Service
Pack 2 <http://tinyurl.com/cbjvr>
* Microsoft Windows XP 64-Bit Edition Service Pack 1 (Itanium)
<http://tinyurl.com/aj86p>
* Microsoft Windows XP 64-Bit Edition Version 2003 (Itanium)
<http://tinyurl.com/e3vnt>
* Microsoft Windows XP Professional x64 Edition
<http://tinyurl.com/72tr3>
* Microsoft Windows Server 2003 and Microsoft Windows Server 2003
Service Pack 1 <http://tinyurl.com/akkb7>
* Microsoft Windows Server 2003 for Itanium-based Systems and Microsoft
Windows Server 2003 with SP1 for Itanium-based Systems
<http://tinyurl.com/e3vnt>
* Microsoft Windows Server 2003 x64 Edition Windows Server 2003 (all
versions) <http://tinyurl.com/8s8j5>
Technical Description:
----------------------
* Server Message Block Vulnerability - CAN-2005-1206 A remote code
execution vulnerability exists in Server Message Block (SMB) that could
allow an attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerable to take
complete control of the affected system.
This email is sent to NTBugtraq automagically as a service to my
subscribers. (v4.01.1975.38886)
Cheers,
Russ Cooper - Senior Scientist - Cybertrust/NTBugtraq Editor
--
NTBugtraq Editor's Note:
Most viruses these days use spoofed email addresses. As such, using an
Anti-Virus product which automatically notifies the perceived sender of a
message it believes is infected may well cause more harm than good. Someone who
did not actually send you a virus may receive the notification and scramble
their support staff to find an infection which never existed in the first
place. Suggest such notifications be disabled by whomever is responsible for
your AV, or at least that the idea is considered.
--
