Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: autorun problems after installing latest MS patches ms05-016 to -022 on Win2k server |
|---|---|
| Date: | Wed, 13 Apr 2005 15:00:00 +0100 |
----Original Message----
From: ntbugtrack Message-Id: 425CA091.1090509@apollolifesciences.com
------------------->snip!<-------------------
logged in as an ordinary Domain User
------------------->snip!<-------------------
all entries in \Documents and Settings\ordinaryDomainUserMrX\Start Menu\Programs\Startup\ HKLM\Software\Microsoft\WindowsNT\CurrentVersion\Run (and possibly others) were not executed but the registry seemed intact. (Why the hack were they not ececuted - the registry entries all seem fine?)
------------------->snip!<-------------------
Strange thing - if I login as Domain Admin, the same processes that were not autostarted for the ordinary user, now all started as expected....
------------------->snip!<-------------------
Anyone any good ideas?
Yes, me. Check the perms on the registry keys using regedt32. Perhaps
some misguided attempt to tighten registry permissions has left the per-user
startup keys without read-permissions for the user in question?
LOL, that would be just like SOOooooo Microsfot!
cheers,
DaveK
--
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....
--
NTBugtraq Editor's Note:
Most viruses these days use spoofed email addresses. As such, using an
Anti-Virus product which automatically notifies the perceived sender of a
message it believes is infected may well cause more harm than good. Someone who
did not actually send you a virus may receive the notification and scramble
their support staff to find an infection which never existed in the first
place. Suggest such notifications be disabled by whomever is responsible for
your AV, or at least that the idea is considered.
--
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Restoring deleted security groups in AD, Higareda, Robert |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [VulnWatch] Windows kernel overflow fixed, NGSSoftware Insight Security Research |
| Previous by Thread: | autorun problems after installing latest MS patches ms05-016 to -022 on Win2k server, ntbugtrack |
| Next by Thread: | [VulnWatch] Windows kernel overflow fixed, NGSSoftware Insight Security Research |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |