Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Administrivia: Sorry about the delayed mails |
|---|---|
| Date: | Tue, 12 Apr 2005 10:10:37 -0400 |
One distinct disadvantage to the current spam levels is all the work one might do to tweak anti-spam filters to minimize the load. One true in place of a false and spam got delivered to my approvals folder while valid messages got delivered to my spam folder. Sigh... Before y'all give me great advice on good anti-spam programs, my problem is somewhat unique. I'm scanning messages within messages, as all of the mail I'm trying to filter comes from the same address (the Listserv processor.) It makes for some interesting challenges in detection and avoiding false detections. I've cleaned up the backlog now (gee, I just thought things were really, really quiet) and corrected the flipped bit. I'll be checking both the approvals and spam folders for some time to ensure this doesn't happen yet again. Cheers, Russ - NTBugtraq Editor -- NTBugtraq Editor's Note: Most viruses these days use spoofed email addresses. As such, using an Anti-Virus product which automatically notifies the perceived sender of a message it believes is infected may well cause more harm than good. Someone who did not actually send you a virus may receive the notification and scramble their support staff to find an infection which never existed in the first place. Suggest such notifications be disabled by whomever is responsible for your AV, or at least that the idea is considered. --
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: SMTP Attacks?, Barry Dorrans |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: SMTP Attacks?, 3APA3A |
| Previous by Thread: | Updates incl in 2003 SP1, Craig Williams |
| Next by Thread: | KB815141 - Internet Explorer Enhanced Security Configuration Chan ges the Browsing Experience, Mitlyng, Matthew J. SGT (MN) |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |