Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | DNS cache poisoning attack |
|---|---|
| Date: | Fri, 1 Apr 2005 10:33:01 -0700 |
Yesterday, I discovered that my clients were being redirected from some of their normally-visited sites to a malware server that purports to be in Laos (in the domain web-search.la). My DNS servers are running on Win2k Server with full patches (according to HFNETCHK). At the time, they were not configured as recommended in MS KB article 241352. I reconfigured the servers, restarted the DNS services and did not see any further DNS poisoning yesterday, so I assumed I had bitten by a problem of my own making. Today, however, I've discovered that the DNS cache poisoning continues, and a quick search for the domain web-search.la through Google reveals that the Internet Storm Center at SANS has been tracking this problem and recommends blocking all traffic to 216.127.88.131 and 218.38.13.108. You can read more at: http://isc.sans.org/diary.php?date=2005-03-30 http://isc.sans.org/diary.php?date=2005-03-31 Paul Wylie Network Systems Manager The Hunt Corporation -- NTBugtraq Editor's Note: Most viruses these days use spoofed email addresses. As such, using an Anti-Virus product which automatically notifies the perceived sender of a message it believes is infected may well cause more harm than good. Someone who did not actually send you a virus may receive the notification and scramble their support staff to find an infection which never existed in the first place. Suggest such notifications be disabled by whomever is responsible for your AV, or at least that the idea is considered. --
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | SMTP Attacks?, Tim Mapes |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Win2003 SP1 goes RTM, srowney |
| Previous by Thread: | SMTP Attacks?, Tim Mapes |
| Next by Thread: | Re: DNS cache poisoning attack, Paul A. Wylie |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |