Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: Firescrolling [Firefox 1.0] |
|---|---|
| Date: | Fri, 25 Feb 2005 11:29:16 -0500 |
Remember my Internet Explorer "scrollbar exploit" based on http-equiv's "What a Drag"? When will people ever learn that "unusual user interaction" can be hidden by common tasks...
Let's combine fireflashing, firetabbing, xul and javascript to run arbitrary code by dragging a scrollbar two times.
__Proof-of-Concept
http://www.mikx.de/firescrolling/
__Status
The exploit is based on multiple vulnerabilities:
bugzilla.mozilla.org #280664 (fireflashing) bugzilla.mozilla.org #280056 (firetabbing) bugzilla.mozilla.org #281807 (firescrolling)
Upgrade to Firefox 1.0.1 or disable javascript.
The Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures project (cve.mitre.org) has assigned the name CAN-2005-0527 to this issue.
Mozilla has apparently decided to delay, to the detriment of its users, the auto-update feature of Firefox 1.0 so that getting 1.0.1 out there, unless someone actually looks for updates manually on mozilla.org, will be delayed several days. These fixes have been a long time coming and to delay them to the general user any longer is a disservice, IMHO.
I would encourage Mozilla to reconsider this delay and get the update out there ASAP via the auto-update feature.
NOTE: Please reply to the list so others may benefit from your thoughts. If you're concerned it may not make it to the list, please cc: me on the reply.
Sincerely, Terabyte Computers, Inc.
Brian S. Bergin President
http://www.terabyte.net
-- NTBugtraq Editor's Note:
Most viruses these days use spoofed email addresses. As such, using an Anti-Virus product which automatically notifies the perceived sender of a message it believes is infected may well cause more harm than good. Someone who did not actually send you a virus may receive the notification and scramble their support staff to find an infection which never existed in the first place. Suggest such notifications be disabled by whomever is responsible for your AV, or at least that the idea is considered. --
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Hidden Applications and rootkits for Windows, Russ |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Firescrolling [Firefox 1.0], Russ |
| Previous by Thread: | [Full-Disclosure] Firescrolling [Firefox 1.0], mikx |
| Next by Thread: | Outlook exploit, Paul Wobbe |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |