Ethical Hacking

Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package.
Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute

Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors.




Network Security NTBugtraq
[Top] [All Lists]

Hidden Applications and rootkits for Windows

Subject: Hidden Applications and rootkits for Windows
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 08:58:34 -0600
I am sure we have all had our rounds with spyware. I have even run up
against the type of spyware/tojan that hides itself from the system so
that it does not appear in any process list and it even hides from
explorer and anything that may use the FileSystemObject to access the
hard drive.

While doing some research for a friend whose server had crashed I ran up
on a couple of web sites that I thought everyone should see. Imagine
processes and applications running on your Windows machines that cannot
be detected by anti-virus and spyware applications. I have never seen
this type of discussion on bugtraq before and it may not be considered a
bug, but I feel that this topic needs some press time. It's VERY scarey.



http://weblogs.asp.net/robert_hensing/archive/2005/01/14/353156.aspx

http://www.rootkit.com <http://www.rootkit.com/>  (I have not
downloaded, nor have I used any of the applications from this web site.)



-Daniel




--
NTBugtraq Editor's Note:

Most viruses these days use spoofed email addresses. As such, using an 
Anti-Virus product which automatically notifies the perceived sender of a 
message it believes is infected may well cause more harm than good. Someone who 
did not actually send you a virus may receive the notification and scramble 
their support staff to find an infection which never existed in the first 
place. Suggest such notifications be disabled by whomever is responsible for 
your AV, or at least that the idea is considered.
--

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>