Microsoft Security Bulletin MS05-005:
Vulnerability in Microsoft Office XP could allow Remote Code Execution (873352)
Bulletin URL:
<http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/MS05-005.mspx>
Version Number: 1.0
Issued Date: Tuesday, February 08, 2005
Impact of Vulnerability: Remote Code Execution
Maximum Severity Rating: Critical
Patch(es) Replaced: This bulletin replaces a prior security update. See the
frequently asked questions (FAQ) section of this bulletin for the complete list.
Caveats: None
Tested Software:
Affected Software:
------------------
* Microsoft Office XP Software Service Pack 3
<http://tinyurl.com/57kpk>
* Microsoft Office XP Software Service Pack 2 Microsoft Office XP Software:
- Word 2002
- PowerPoint 2002
<http://tinyurl.com/57kpk>
* Microsoft Project 2002
<http://tinyurl.com/6wwhm>
* Microsoft Visio 2002
<http://tinyurl.com/3kozc>
* Microsoft Works Suite 2002 (same as the Microsoft Office XP link)
<http://tinyurl.com/57kpk>
* Microsoft Works Suite 2003 (same as the Microsoft Office XP link)
<http://tinyurl.com/57kpk>
* Microsoft Works Suite 2004 (same as the Microsoft Office XP link)
<http://tinyurl.com/57kpk>
Technical Description:
----------------------
* Buffer Overrun in Microsoft Office XP Vulnerability - CAN-2004-0848: A
vulnerability exists in Microsoft Office XP software that could allow remote
code execution on an affected system. An attacker who successfully exploited
this vulnerability could take complete control of the affected system.
This email is sent to NTBugtraq automagically as a service to my subscribers.
(v4.01.1837.24459)
Cheers,
Russ - Senior Scientist - TruSecure Corporation/NTBugtraq Editor
--
NTBugtraq Editor's Note:
Most viruses these days use spoofed email addresses. As such, using an
Anti-Virus product which automatically notifies the perceived sender of a
message it believes is infected may well cause more harm than good. Someone who
did not actually send you a virus may receive the notification and scramble
their support staff to find an infection which never existed in the first
place. Suggest such notifications be disabled by whomever is responsible for
your AV, or at least that the idea is considered.
--
