Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Logon Hours and Local Admin Equivalence |
|---|---|
| Date: | Tue, 26 Oct 2004 14:58:49 -0400 |
I've got a 2k domain at my house with a few machines on it, one which my son has local Admin equivalence (Req'd for that mission critical app America's Army). I have noticed when he has this access level, that the logon hours do not necessarily apply. Once authenticated, the GPO to force him off doesn't work properly. If I manually log the account off, domain authentication prevents logon, or if I force a local policy to kick him off, it will only work for that session. (force it with secedit) . I have this set @ in both the local and domain policies. It appears having local god equiv neuters the logout hours... In short, it appears that if a user on a 2k domain has Admin rights on the local machine, the account will be divorced from the network, but will still allowed to stay logged on to the local machine outside of the explicit hours set, regardless of how Global or Local policies are set. Once they log out of the machine, life works as expected. A) Has anyone else seen this behavior, or am I configuration challenged? B) Assuming I'm not policy challenged, would you consider this a security weakness (flaw), or a design flaw? C) I don't have a 2k3 domain up yet to test this with, has anyone seen this behavior on 2k3? -- NTBugtraq Editor's Note: Want to reply to the person who sent this message? This list is configured such that just hitting reply is going to result in the message coming to the list, not to the individual who sent the message. This was done to help reduce the number of Out of Office messages posters received. So if you want to send a reply just to the poster, you'll have to copy their email address out of the message and place it in your TO: field. --
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: How to Break Windows XP SP2 + Internet Explorer 6 SP2, Tod Beardsley |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Presentation: Bypassing client application protection techniques with notepad, 3APA3A |
| Previous by Thread: | Problems with MS04-032, Russ |
| Next by Thread: | Presentation: Bypassing client application protection techniques with notepad, 3APA3A |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |