Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: ASP.Net vulnerability |
|---|---|
| Date: | Thu, 7 Oct 2004 09:34:01 -0600 |
BugTraqers, There was lively discussion about the ASP.net vulnerability on the IIS discussion lists at iislists.com yesterday. I've had conversations with IIS support and the IIS team. The nut of it is that that all ASP.net applications need to be modified per the instructions immediately. Regardless of what you may read elsewhere, the update needs to be applied regardless of the type of authentication used in the asp.net application. The modifications Microsoft published are not a best practice or a suggestion - but an essential security fix to put in place till an update to asp.net is prepared. Disabling parent paths will not solve the problem and I'm guessing that URLScan is not a complete solution either. The only exception I know about is if you aren't using asp.net. In other words, if you are only delivering static pages or classic asp, then you're not at risk as the request has to be handled by the asp.net ISAPI. However any website delivering ASP.net content needs to be updated ASAP. Brett Hill IIS MVP IIStraining.com -- NTBugtraq Editor's Note: Want to reply to the person who sent this message? This list is configured such that just hitting reply is going to result in the message coming to the list, not to the individual who sent the message. This was done to help reduce the number of Out of Office messages posters received. So if you want to send a reply just to the poster, you'll have to copy their email address out of the message and place it in your TO: field. --
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Microsoft Knowledge Base Article - 887459, John Galt |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Disclosure policy in Re: RealPlayer vulnerabilities, Martin Viktora |
| Previous by Thread: | ASP.Net vulnerabillity, Steve Shockley |
| Next by Thread: | Microsoft Knowledge Base Article - 887459, John Galt |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |