Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Need to purge vulnerable gdiplus.dll? |
|---|---|
| Date: | Tue, 28 Sep 2004 19:08:04 -0500 |
How are people handling vulnerable versions of gdiplus.dll, vgx.dll, mso.dll, and other attack vectors that are left on systems and not being upgraded by available patches? On several machines, I'm still seeing a vulnerable version of gdiplus.dll in the C:\Winnt\system32 directory, even after I applied all of MS's MS04-028 patches applicable to the machines. (Tom Liston's GDI Scan (http://isc.sans.org/gdiscan.php) actually reveals a few vulnerable files left, but it's the ones in SYSTEM32 that really worry me.) A regedit search shows that C:\Winnt\System32\gdiplus.dll is part of the HKLM\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\SharedDLLs key. The Value is the path/file name and the Data is "1." I believe that means it's registered to one program. I'm inferring that one of the many non-MS programs installed registered that DLL, but how does the DLL get upgraded now? I saw a post somewhere (sorry - can't find the reference) saying one should not just remove/replace vulnerable DLLs lest breakage occur. Understandable if it's a modified 3rd party version. But this seems to be Microsoft's DLL file (version 5.1.3097.0). And in the System32 folder, this seems like a land mine waiting to go off. Has anyone else seen this? What techniques are people using to remove/update these DLLs? Are things breaking or going OK? Thanks in advance. -J. M. Kohn Chicago ----- NTBugtraq Editor's Note: Want to reply to the person who sent this message? This list is configured such that just hitting reply is going to result in the message coming to the list, not to the individual who sent the message. This was done to help reduce the number of Out of Office messages posters received. So if you want to send a reply just to the poster, you'll have to copy their email address out of the message and place it in your TO: field. -----
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: MinorRev: Microsoft Security Bulletin MS04-028 - Buffer Overrun in JPEG Processing (GDI+) Could Allow Code Execution (833987), ntbug list |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Finjan Security Advisory: JPEG Exploit Used Remotely (Demonstration), Rafel Ivgi, The-Insider |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: GDI Replacing Tool, Louis Solomon [SteelBytes] |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Need to purge vulnerable gdiplus.dll?, Russ |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |