Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Changed Firewall Policy in XP SP2 |
|---|---|
| Date: | Mon, 13 Sep 2004 16:52:35 -0400 |
One of the SP2 Firewall policies appears to have a somewhat new behavior, if "Not Configured". This may be old news, and if so, I apologize, but I have not seen it mentioned to date. Policy name: Reschedule Automatic Updates scheduled installation The explanation for this policy is: ======================= "Specifies the amount of time for Automatic Updates to wait, following system startup, before proceeding with a scheduled installation that was missed previously." "If the status is set to Enabled, a scheduled installation that did not take place earlier will occur the specified number of minutes after the computer is next started." "If the status is set to Disabled, a missed scheduled installation will occur with the next scheduled installation." "If the status is set to Not Configured, a missed scheduled installation will occur one minute after the computer is next started." "Note: This policy applies only when Automatic Updates is configured to perform scheduled installations of updates. If the 'Configure Automatic Updates' policy is disabled, this policy has no effect." ======================= Previously, the behavior was, "If the status is set to Disabled or Not Configured, a missed scheduled installation will occur with the next scheduled installation." Now, behavior if Disabled is different from behavior if Not Configured, and behavior if Not Configured is clearly different from what it was previously. Joe Dance University of South Carolina --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] ----- NTBugtraq Editor's Note: Want to reply to the person who sent this message? This list is configured such that just hitting reply is going to result in the message coming to the list, not to the individual who sent the message. This was done to help reduce the number of Out of Office messages posters received. So if you want to send a reply just to the poster, you'll have to copy their email address out of the message and place it in your TO: field. -----
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Inconsistencies between Windows Updates and AU/SUS, Joe Dance |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Alert: Microsoft Security Bulletin MS04-028 - Buffer Overrun in JPEG Processing (GDI+) Could Allow Code Execution (833987), Polazzo Justin |
| Previous by Thread: | Inconsistencies between Windows Updates and AU/SUS, Joe Dance |
| Next by Thread: | SUS server fails to synchronize with Windows Update servers, Joe Dance |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |