Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | libnet NG vs. libnet and Python bindings... |
|---|---|
| Date: | Tue, 18 Jan 2005 17:44:42 +0900 |
Hi, I'm looking at creating and maintaining a new set of Python bindings for libnet. How close is libnet-ng to being workable in the field? I'm wondering which version to support. I know that there exists such a library for the older libnet but it is not really a complete solution. Pointers to docs and URLs welcome. Thanks, George
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Code working with LIBNET_RAW4, not with LIBNET_LINK, Karen Pease |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Code working with LIBNET_RAW4, not with LIBNET_LINK, Aaron Turner |
| Previous by Thread: | Code working with LIBNET_RAW4, not with LIBNET_LINK, Karen Pease |
| Next by Thread: | Re: libnet NG vs. libnet and Python bindings..., Frédéric Raynal |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |