Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | [ISN] US Government Studies Open Source Quality |
|---|---|
| Date: | Wed, 15 Mar 2006 02:22:36 -0600 (CST) |
http://www.osvdb.org/blog/?p=104 US Government Studies Open Source Quality "US Government Studies Open Source Quality" reads the SlashDot thread, and it certainly sounds interesting. Reading deeper, it links to an article by the Reg titled "Homeland Security report tracks down rogue open source code". The author of the article, Gavin Clarke, doesnt link to the company who performed the study (Coverity) or the report itself. A quick Google search finds the Coverity home page. On the right hand side, under Library, there is a link titled "NEW >> Open Source Quality Report". Clicking that, you are faced with "request information", checking the Open Source Quality Report box (one of seven boxes including Request Sales Call as the first option, and Linux Security Report is the default checked box), and then filling out 14 fields of personal information, 10 of which are required. So, let me get this straight. My tax dollars fund the Department of Homeland Security. The DHS opts to spend $1.24 million dollars on security research, by funding a university and two commercial companies. One of the commercial companies does research into open source software, and creates a report detailing their findings. To get a copy of this report, you must give the private/commercial company your first name, last name, company name, city, state, telephone, how you heard about them, email address, and a password for their site (you can optionally give them your title, and describe your project). Excuse me, but it should be a CRIME for them to require that kind of personal information for a study that I helped fund via my tax dollars. Given this is a study of open source software, requiring registration and giving up that kind of personal information is doubly insulting. Coverity, you should be ashamed at using extortion to share information/research that should be free. Even worse, your form does not accept RFC compliant e-mail addresses (RFC 822, RFC 2142 (section 4) and RFC 2821). Now I have to add your company to my "no plus" web page for not even understanding and following 24 year old RFC standards. HOW CAN WE TRUST ANYTHING YOU PUBLISH?! Oh, if you dont want to go through all of that hassle, you can grab a copy of the PDF report anyway. http://osvdb.org/ref/blog/open_source_quality_report.pdf _________________________________ InfoSec News v2.0 - Coming Soon! http://www.infosecnews.org
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [ISN] OfficeMax: No evidence of security breach, InfoSec News |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [ISN] Computer hacker pleads guilty, InfoSec News |
| Previous by Thread: | [ISN] OfficeMax: No evidence of security breach, InfoSec News |
| Next by Thread: | [ISN] Computer hacker pleads guilty, InfoSec News |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |