Ethical Hacking

Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package.
Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute

Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors.




Network Security Information-Security-News
[Top] [All Lists]

[ISN] U.S. Cybersecurity Office May Relocate

Subject: [ISN] U.S. Cybersecurity Office May Relocate
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 02:15:34 -0500 (CDT)
Forwarded from: William Knowles <wk@c4i.org>

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A43001-2004Sep22.html

By TED BRIDIS
The Associated Press
September 22, 2004

WASHINGTON - The House will propose moving cybersecurity offices from
the Department of Homeland Security to the White House as part of the
intelligence reorganization, according to draft legislation obtained
Wednesday by The Associated Press. The bill, expected to be introduced
Thursday, would place cybersecurity into the White House budget
office.

The change reflects frustration among some Republican lawmakers about
what they view as a lack of attention paid to cybersecurity by the
Department of Homeland Security (DHS).

Some technology companies also have expressed similar concerns, but
industry lobbyists reacted cautiously Wednesday to the proposal.

"DHS deserves the opportunity to demonstrate its effectiveness before
taking this step," said Tom Galvin, a vice president at Verisign Inc.,
an information security firm. But he said he understood the
frustration among some in the industry and in Congress.

The Department of Homeland Security considers equally important the
protection of the nation's physical structures, such as bridges and
buildings, and computer networks, which regulate the flow of
electricity, phone calls, finances and other information.

Many leading technology companies have urged the Bush administration
to pay greater attention to cybersecurity, arguing that a shutdown of
vital networks could lead to sustained power outages and other serious
disruptions.

"The fact that this is even being discussed reveals an incredible
level of unhappiness and frustration over how DHS has handled
cybersecurity," said Roger Cressey, a former White House cybersecurity
adviser.

The government's cybersecurity chief, Amit Yoran, works at least three
steps beneath Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge. Yoran, who is
well regarded by the technology industry, effectively replaced a
position in the White House National Security Council once held by
Richard Clarke, a special adviser to President Bush.

The new proposal would create a new Office of Critical Infrastructure
Information Protection at the Office of Management and Budget. Its new
administrator would be responsible for analyzing electronic threats
from hackers and terrorists against vital networks, issuing warnings
about attacks, reducing weaknesses and coordinating with private
companies and organizations.

Those are currently responsibilities of the National Cyber Security
Division, run by Yoran inside the Infrastructure Assurance and
Information Protection directorate at Homeland Security.

The White House budget office already has ties to cybersecurity
issues; the government's council of chief information officers, which
coordinates federal computer issues, works out of OMB. The office also
has worked extensively on "e-government" issues, such as compelling
federal agencies to offer citizens electronic copies of paperwork.

Still, the Republicans' proposal - and the sudden decision to include
it in fast-moving legislation to reform the U.S. intelligence
bureaucracy - surprised some technology industry leaders.

"We weren't consulted," said Harris Miller, head of the Information
Technology Association of America, the industry's leading trade group
in Washington. "It's not saying it's a bad idea, but it's out of the
blue."


 
*==============================================================*
"Communications without intelligence is noise;  Intelligence
without communications is irrelevant." Gen Alfred. M. Gray, USMC
----------------------------------------------------------------
C4I.org - Computer Security, & Intelligence - http://www.c4i.org
*==============================================================*



_________________________________________
Donate online for the Ron Santo Walk to Cure Diabetes - 
http://www.c4i.org/ethan.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [ISN] U.S. Cybersecurity Office May Relocate, InfoSec News <=