Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: Possible Mail server compromise ? |
|---|---|
| Date: | Thu, 21 Feb 2008 10:38:04 +0800 |
Huh? Read what you link to. ... In this process aps-AV will neither examine the data for known virus signatures nor submit it to any parsing operations. Only after the data has entered the execution environment, which next to running on a high security operating system does not provide any network interfaces, the AV-engines start their work and check the e-mail attachments for malicious code. If any abnormality is detected, the whole environment will be completely deleted, including the operating system, and the incident will be marked as an attack on the respective AV-product. ... Ed <http://blog.eonsec.com> On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 3:33 AM, Faas M. Mathiasen <faas.m.mathiasen@googlemail.com> wrote:
Dear Eduardo, > This no-parsing/ParsingSafe technology is actually Sandboxing [1]. How do you know ? Reads not really like it, Is there anybody from nruns that is reading this list ? Maybe they can comment on their own solution ?? > BTW they keep repeating this: > ... > In order to protect the aps-AV itself from attacks, it has been > completely written in highly secure managed code ( C#) , thereby > reducing its attack surface to an absolute minimum. > ... > > [1] <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sandbox_(computer_security)> > > Ed <http://blog.eonsec.com> > > On Feb 19, 2008 3:19 AM, Faas M. Mathiasen > <faas.m.mathiasen@googlemail.com> wrote: > > ... > > Apparently they happen, as the guys from n.runs seem to have invented > > some sort of solution for this problem, rendering attacks on AV > > impossible (??) they call it aps-AV : > > "Protects your company from malware threats (Worms, Virus, Trojans..), > > aps-AV reuses your existing Anti-Virus software and supports multiple > > Anti-Virus engines. aps-AV increases the malware detection rate > > through the diversity and heuristics of these multiple engines. > > However unlike the competition, aps-AV does not increase the remotely > > exploitable attack surface." > > > > http://www.nruns.com/_en/aps/ > > http://www.nruns.com/_downloads/aps-AV-Solution-Paper-EN.pdf > > > > ... >
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Possible Mail server compromise ?, Paul Schmehl |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: Possible Mail server compromise ?, Richard C Lewis |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Possible Mail server compromise ?, Faas M. Mathiasen |
| Next by Thread: | Security log parser, Jason Alexander |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |