Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: Possible Mail server compromise ? |
|---|---|
| Date: | Wed, 13 Feb 2008 00:09:56 -0500 |
On Wed, 2008-02-13 at 00:41 +0100, Faas M. Mathiasen wrote: [snip]
Is anybody aware if this is common knowledge? Who else has seen such an attack ? Are you monitoring your mail servers for such compromises regularly? The name of the Anti-Virus scanner will not be told, exploit might be available up on request, as soon as we analyzed it for content that might reveal specifics about us.
Unfortunately, this is not an uncommon occurance as numerous vulnerabilities have been discovered in AV vendor software [1]. In fact, SANS listed antivirus software as one of the top 20 security risks of 2007 [2]. While many of these vulnerabilities are considered only "locally" exploitable, using the engines within the context of a mail server exposes them to be triggered remotely by any rogue email as you have seen. To address these exploits against mail servers (and against normal end hosts as well), I'd suggest deploying your scan engines within a disposable virtualized environment that can be thrown away when a exploit is detected and restored from a clean snapshot. For example, we currently employ a milter frontend that sends mail attachments to a backend service for analysis that has 10 antivirus engines and 2 behavioral engines, each within a Xen VM instance. This obviously increases the amount of malware we can detect with multiple, heterogeneous engines, but more importantly, provides strong isolation from the mail server itself. Regards, Jon Oberheide [1] NVD ulnerabilities by AV vendor between 2005 and 2007 [2] http://www.sans.org/top20/#s5 -- Jon Oberheide <jon@oberheide.org> GnuPG Key: 1024D/F47C17FE Fingerprint: B716 DA66 8173 6EDD 28F6 F184 5842 1C89 F47C 17FE
av-vulns.png
Description: PNG image
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
| Previous by Date: | Re: Possible Mail server compromise ?, Michael Loftis |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Security log parser, Jason Alexander |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Possible Mail server compromise ?, Michael Loftis |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Possible Mail server compromise ?, Faas M. Mathiasen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |