Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: DNS CACHE POISONING? - Our Portal is redirecting to our first competition |
|---|---|
| Date: | Wed, 30 Jan 2008 13:15:30 -0500 |
All bets are off because there is no way to conclusively prove that a compromise stopped at a certain point. Best practice dictates that you reimage the box[1]. The issue really is that nobody has complete knowledge of everything. Any number of as yet unreported exploits could have been used to elevate privileges for example. I'll go out on a limb and claim that various blackhat communities know of exploits that vendors and admins are as yet unaware of. The only defense against that sort of thing is a reliable recovery process. In my experience the cost of 'overreacting' to a compromise is greatly offset by the risk posed by not fully eliminating the risk of exposing sensitive internal processes/data. I will grant you that each incident does present different degrees of exposure/risk. However, if I were going to put my name beside the solution, I would want to recommend the best course of action to completely mitigate/eliminate risk. What is actually implemented may differ, but at that point I would feel that my expected due diligence had been met and that everyone understood what any remaining risks were and found them acceptable. [1] http://www.cert.org/tech_tips/root_compromise.html On Jan 29, 2008 7:22 PM, Eduardo Tongson <propolice@gmail.com> wrote:
Yeah, completely forgot about those ran as root and setuid programs. Been a while since I have seen those. Also forgot about the usual admin errors. But it is ridiculous to say "all bets are off" when a user gets a shell. Thats got a lot to say about the admin in charge. Ed <http://blog.eonsec.com> On Jan 30, 2008 2:59 AM, <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu> wrote:On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 07:57:39 +0800, Eduardo Tongson said:kernel used is fully updated and root SSH login dismissed do you know a way of getting root without an unknown kernel bug?The *vast* majority of "get r00t kwik" exploits do *not* involve exploiting kernel bugs, but involve exploiting daemon processes running as root or set-UID programs. So if you have CUPS running, they don't need a kernel exploit, they just need a CUPS exploit (and CUPS *has* had a few issues). Same for Sendmail, NTP, the X server, or any of the other things found on the average Unix/Linux install....
-- J.
| Previous by Date: | Re: DNS CACHE POISONING? - Our Portal is redirecting to our first competition, Graeme Fowler |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: DNS CACHE POISONING? - Our Portal is redirecting to our first competition, Eduardo Tongson |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: DNS CACHE POISONING? - Our Portal is redirecting to our first competition, Graeme Fowler |
| Next by Thread: | Re: DNS CACHE POISONING? - Our Portal is redirecting to our first competition, Eduardo Tongson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |