Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | DoS attacks using ports 31800, 31900 ? |
|---|---|
| Date: | Fri, 2 Feb 2007 10:27:37 -0800 |
A certain amount of the packets that arrive at our gateway are blowback, remote hosts responding to traffic where an address in our block was forged as the source. These are most often ICMP Port Unreachables generated by UDP Windows Messenger spam, with SYN-ACKs from port 80 running a distant second. Within the last 24-48 hours, I've noticed something new: significant numbers of SYN-ACKs from port 31800, and a smaller number from 31900, from less than a dozen addresses scattered around the Internet. None of those addresses has yet resolved via rDNS. My working theory -- unless someone can suggest a better one -- is that these handful of hosts are under a spoofed (might or might not be distributed) DoS attack. "Count" is roughly how many packets came to our Class B block in 9 hours. IP Address Port Count 60.31.208.10 31800 3100 60.190.108.57 31800 3500 60.191.0.2 31800 26 late start 61.142.160.181 31800 4200 124.243.201.171 31800 3100 125.64.16.79 31800 4500 There don't seem to have been any 31900 packets in this sample. When I saw the 31900s, it seemed that those targets were a separate set, and no IP address was associated with both 31800 and 31900 traffic. (I do have some captured headers that would include them, but that was before I was really watching for them and so the volume data wouldn't be reliable.) 4500 packets in 9 hours is about 500 an hour. If the source addresses are spoofed at random, and this sample is for a single Class B block, then we could guestimate that the target IP that's putting out the SYN-ACKs is seeing about 32 million SYNs an hour, half a million a minute, or 8000-odd per second -- that it is managing to send SYN-ACKs for. David Gillett
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Next by Date: | Re: Tracking down random ICMP, Frank Knobbe |
|---|---|
| Next by Thread: | Re: DoS attacks using ports 31800, 31900 ?, Deapesh Misra |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |