Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: Massive SPAM Increase |
|---|---|
| Date: | Tue, 17 Oct 2006 14:33:54 +1300 |
On Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 12:17:51PM -0500, Paul Schmehl wrote: > It appears that what you're missing is that this one "flaw" is not enough > to get mail rejected by policyd-weight.
What you're missing is that the assumption that systems sending valid mail will always (or even will usually) be listed in DNS is fundamentally wrong and should never be used even as a weighted guess to indicate spam.
Well, they may be listed in SPF records, though I agree not in MX.
And by itself, I don't believe SPF provides a useful indication one way or the other as to whether a message is spam or not. Lots of spammers set up SPF records these days.
cheers, Jamie -- Jamie Riden, CISSP / jamesr@europe.com / jamie.riden@gmail.com NZ Honeynet project - http://www.nz-honeynet.org/
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This List Sponsored by: Black Hat
http://www.blackhat.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Previous by Date: | Re: Massive SPAM Increase {-2.6} {-2.6}, Steve Friedl |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: ***SPAM*** Re: Massive SPAM Increase {-2.6} {-2.6}, gabriel rosenkoetter |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Massive SPAM Increase, gabriel rosenkoetter |
| Next by Thread: | Re: ***SPAM*** Re: ***SPAM*** Re: Massive SPAM Increase {-2.6} {-2.6}, Dude VanWinkle |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |