Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: ***SPAM*** Re: Massive SPAM Increase {-2.6} {-2.6} |
|---|---|
| Date: | Mon, 16 Oct 2006 12:39:40 -0500 |
For various reasons, which you can easily google, I don't think spf (at least in its present form) is a useful solution.
What Paul is *trying* to do is deal with the fact that any Windows-like box with spamware is *also* configured to send mail out.
What he's *looking* for is called "SPF", not "outbound MX".
Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) Adjunct Information Security Officer The University of Texas at Dallas http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/
p7sHiAtY0DGTU.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
| Previous by Date: | Re: ***SPAM*** Re: Massive SPAM Increase {-2.6} {-2.6}, Paul Schmehl |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: ***SPAM*** Re: Massive SPAM Increase {-2.6} {-2.6}, benfell |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: ***SPAM*** Re: Massive SPAM Increase {-2.6} {-2.6}, Valdis . Kletnieks |
| Next by Thread: | Re: ***SPAM*** Re: Massive SPAM Increase {-2.6} {-2.6}, gabriel rosenkoetter |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |