Ethical Hacking

Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package.
Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute

Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors.




Network Security Incidents
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: ***SPAM*** Re: ***SPAM*** Re: Massive SPAM Increase {-2.6} {- 2.6}

Subject: Re: ***SPAM*** Re: ***SPAM*** Re: Massive SPAM Increase {-2.6} {- 2.6}
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 02:30:14 -0400
--On October 14, 2006 1:44:04 AM -0400 Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:

On Fri, 13 Oct 2006 22:52:12 CDT, you said:

I'm not sure what you mean by "split inbound and outbound", but any
outbound MX host *should* be listed in DNS.

Tell you what.  Explain what an *OUTBOUND* MX is, and I'll see what I
can do.

The machine in question is *NOT* listed as an MX, because it is *NOT* a
machine that should be accepting *inbound* mail for the domain.  Its
purpose in life is to send mail to off-campus sites.

It appears that what you're missing is that this one "flaw" is not enough 
to get mail rejected by policyd-weight.  Policyd-weight, much like SA, 
works on cumulative scoring.  One "bad" thing isn't going to get your mail 
rejected.  But, in general, spam, viruses, phishing scams, et. al. will 
not only not be listed as an MX in DNS, they also won't reverse.  They 
also forge the domain.  They also lie about the sender domain.  They also 
come from dialups or from known "spammy" servers.  So, the *cumulative* 
effect is that the mail gets rejected.

One "flaw" such as a missing MX record is not going to cause a problem.

Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu)
Adjunct Information Security Officer
The University of Texas at Dallas
http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/


The sender believes that this E-mail and any attachments were free of any
virus, worm, Trojan horse, and/or malicious code when sent. This message and
its attachments could have been infected during transmission. By reading the
message and opening any attachments, the recipient accepts full
responsibility for taking protective and remedial action about viruses and
other defects. The sender's employer is not liable for any loss or damage
arising in any way from this message or its attachments.

<<application/ms-tnef>>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This List Sponsored by: Black Hat

Attend the Black Hat Briefings & Training USA, July 29-August 3 in Las Vegas. 
World renowned security experts reveal tomorrow's threats today. Free of 
vendor pitches, the Briefings are designed to be pragmatic regardless of your 
security environment. Featuring 36 hands-on training courses and 10 conference 
tracks, networking opportunities with over 2,500 delegates from 40+ nations. 

http://www.blackhat.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: ***SPAM*** Re: ***SPAM*** Re: Massive SPAM Increase {-2.6} {- 2.6}, Paul Schmehl <=