Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: Decrease in Threats? |
|---|---|
| Date: | Mon, 30 Jan 2006 12:03:00 -0700 |
On Sun, Jan 29, 2006 at 12:15:13PM +1300, Bojan Zdrnja wrote:
Greylisting works OK at the moment as spammers have no need to go around it. But, you can be sure that once greylisting reaches critical level of deployment, spammers will go around it very easy (basically they just have to modify their applications).
Indeed, I believe that some spammers, accidentally or deliberately, have already done just that. Last summer, I saw pill-spammers sending multiple messages from the same source, with the same envelope, and to the same recipient over about a seven-minute period. This cut through my greylisting quite effectively until I increased the greylist delay. I haven't noticed any viruses yet that are effective at bypassing greylisting - I've only seen a few make it as far as my antivirus in the last few weeks. To get around greylisting, they'd need to dedicate space to keeping track of what sender they used for each recipient. If and when spammers and virus authors do start changing their methods, I predict the use of greylisting to buy time for spam- & virus-traps to feed a good old-fashioned blacklist. -- William Aoki KD7YAF waoki@umnh.utah.edu 5-1924
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Decrease in Threats?, Kurt Seifried |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: wired traffic, fowl8510 |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Decrease in Threats?, Bojan Zdrnja |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Decrease in Threats?, Gene Rackow |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |