Ethical Hacking

Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package.
Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute

Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors.




Network Security Incidents
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: REVIEW: "Incident Response", Douglas Schweitzer

Subject: Re: REVIEW: "Incident Response", Douglas Schweitzer
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 09:11:34 -0500
Stephen J. Smoogen wrote:

I found the O'Reilly book was good on setting up an Incident Response

team versus Forensics work.

http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/incidentres/index.html


Thanks for the plug. As you point out, Rick Forno and I tried to address how create and start an IRT in our book, which is now out of print by the way. We saw (and still see) forensics as being very different than incident response. (More recent nomenclature would probably be "incident handling" or "incident management", but that's beside the point.)

In any case, our book is quite out of date as well as out of print. The good news, though, is that the kind folks over at O'Reilly have given it back to us at our request. We're planning on open sourcing it, making it available as a free resource to the community, as well as working on some of its much-needed updates. Not sure about the timeline, but the process is currently under way. Ideas, suggestions, volunteer effort, etc., are always appreciated.

I'd also suggest, by the way, looking at NIST's incident handling guide, Special Publication 800-61 (http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/nistpubs/800-61/sp800-61.pdf). IMHO, it's a good document. Although it's a tad US government centric, there's still a lot of valuable information there for others.

Cheers,

Ken van Wyk
http://www.KRvW.com

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>