Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: WMF Threat OK , but no huge attack ... WHY ? |
|---|---|
| Date: | Mon, 9 Jan 2006 23:38:04 -0600 |
The Windows Metafile vulnerability requires user interaction forexploit, therefore it (to my knowledge) isn't worm-able. As to why wedidn't see a major virus outbreak, perhaps all the black-hats wereaway on holiday :) My personal hypothesis is that malicious virus writers really aren'tthat smart. We might see some threat agents for this vulnerability ina few months, after the real risk has passed. After all, a trulyintelligent person can make money or gain notoriety through lessdangerous and better paying means (perhaps as a vulnerabilityresearcher). Any other theories? On 9 Jan 2006 17:34:18 -0000, pejman.gohari@gmail.com<pejman.gohari@gmail.com> wrote:> Hi,>> The WMF threat was and continues to be important.> But I'm curious to know why we didn't observe any important attack on Internet?>> WMF was a perfect Zero-Day attack and a scenario like the blackout of Internet was possible … but nothing … or no important attack!> No BOT virus deployed? No DOS worm attack? …>> All hackers become white-hat?> Or they attacked and we didn't see anything?>> Any hypothese / explanation ?>> Regards,> Pejman>
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Dead thread: Why was there no WMF Internet Attack..., Daniel Hanson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: WMF Threat OK , but no huge attack ... WHY ?, Thierry Zoller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: WMF Threat OK , but no huge attack ... WHY ?, Byron Sonne |
| Next by Thread: | Re: WMF Threat OK , but no huge attack ... WHY ?, Thierry Zoller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |